I Ask Again, Why Attack Flat Earth Theory?
I posted an article a few days ago asking why anyone who questions the system on EVERYTHING blindly accepts the globetard lie? When I first heard about Flat Earth Theory I thought it crazy. Plus I didn't want it to be true, as every physics paper I have authored would be made mute without the Globe Earth Model. But, being an inquisitive creature, I looked into this theory. And most of the evidence was correct. But that's not what surprised me.
No, what surprised me the most was the utter lack of any evidence to back up what I had been taught since I was five years old. I could find no proof that the Earth was a globe. And when I tried to disprove the Flat Earth Theory, as I always do with new theories, I could not prove it wrong. And when I looked to NASA for evidence, all I found were fake photos and cartoons.
So I threw out my belief in yet another jewish lie and began to believe in Flat Earth Theory. Which sucks, as ALL of my physics papers became unprovable under the new model. Oh, well. Truth is truth, even when it hurts. But then something else happened that just reinforced my acceptance of the new model. That was the way people slandered me and attacked me over this new belief.
Let me explain this. So, all the evidence proves the Earth exists on a flat plane. Naturally formed via basic laws of Nature and evolution. I ain't no spookist!! In fact, I am annoyed by the fact that 99% of those who believe in Flat Earth Theory are monotheist-insaners. Some christ-insaners, a few orthodox jews who reject the JEW WORLD ORDER's use of the globe lie, and every mudlim. Some Pagans and Odinists do, too. But those of us that are called atheist who believe in Flat Earth Theory are small. But that ain't the queerest thing. It's how I get attacked by the globetards that's crazy.
They bash me with emotion. As if I were attacking their religion. The logical part of their brain shuts off and the emotional side goes into overdrive. As if the globe myth was their christ-insanity. And in away belief in the globe Earth model and the Big Bang and Black Holes is more inline with spooky religious mythology than science. I mean, everything came together in a ball smaller than an atom, from nowhere aparently, and then exploded for no reason into the Universe. Which, depending on the 'scientist' you ask, is exspanding either via speeding up, slowing down, or at a stagnant pace... Huh??? How does that not sound like monotheist bible bullshit?
And Black Holes? Where the fuck does all that matter go? You claim that fancy Astro physics 'proves' that the matter shrinks to the size of an atom and doesn't explode like the Big Bang myth? Oh, it's also so strong it keeps matter in, except sometimes it spits stuff out. Depending on the 'scientist' you ask, of course.
But, really, the Big Bang, magical gravity, Black Holes, this all sounds like religion to me. Spooky religious nonsense. Even Light is lied about in the pseudoscience of Astro Physics. Light, we are told, is a constant. But that's not true. Some scientists measure the speed of light having a wide range. A very wide range, in fact. And one of my physics papers actually uses Black Holes to disprove the so-called 'constant speed' of light. I guess in either theory light just ain't what we are told it is.
I mean, what sounds more scientific to you :
The Universe came into being via some magical mumbo jumbo. And we live on a ball, that is one of eight different possible shapes, magically sticking to it while we croon around space at a million miles per hour. And even though we spin and travel and change our position in the Universe every hour, somehow the Constellations have maintained their current shape and area of the night sky for 50,000 years.
OR
The Universe evolved into a shaped dimension with layers, via natural evolution. That the Constellations have maintained their current shape and area in our sky for at least 42,000 years because the Earth does not rotate. And the Law of Density, not gravity, is why we stick to the Earth, and clouds rise above it. It's called Air-to-Ground ratio.
Which one of those sounds more like science to you? I'm going with the latter. You can keep your mythological MAGICAL globe fairy tale.
But I ask yet again, debate me with science and common sense, NOT simply throwing libtard slander at me because you get EMOTIONAL whenever someone points out the lie you were fed since childhood. I mean, you question the JFK assassination, the Moon 'landings', NASA's other bullshit, WW2, the holohoax, tranny craziness, the Mandela Effect, Waco, Ruby Ridge, the Trade Towers, Oklahoma City, etc..... But yet when it comes to Flat Earth you get as emotional as a jew whenever someone points out that the jewish population rose in the 1940's, NOT declined.
So, debate me. Sure. Just keep your emotions out of it. And stop sending me digital fake shots from NASA as so-called 'proof'. Some of that shite looks worse than a 10 year old's drawing!! Hey, if your myth is so right, you should be able to disprove mine, right?!
Here are some facts :
I have been on top of mountain peaks as high as 12,000 feet, up in a hot air balloon, and in aeroplanes at 35,000 feet, and yet have never seen a curve. Not to mention that you can use long-range cameras and binoculars to bring back into focus ships that supposedly 'dissopear downward over the horizon'. It's called the Law of Perspective. Thankfully modern technology proves the Horizon is NOT a curve.
The same system you are on this site/forum to question is the same system that has an agency who's job it is to promote disinformation on Flat Earth Theory. WHY??? If it's such a bullshit theory why spend tens of millions of dollars annually to discredit it with made-up crap?
NASA has not shown one piece of actual proof to back up it's CGI pictures of 'space'.
Why are satellites sent up attached to helium balloons? And how did they launch 100,000 satellites to begin with? There have only been a few thousand 'space' launches in history!?!
What did the SpaceX rocket hit and ricochet off of when it was launched? A Russian forcefield? Some magical wall? Maybe it was Allah? He don't want no rockets up in his home. Right? lol
Why wont they let anyone explore Antarctica? Even when you ask for a deep tour of the place they only send you to this one little area. Why can't you travel to the supposed centre? To the actual South Pole point?
The actual theory of the Flat Earth Model is that the Earth exists on a large plane. There are no edges, just as the Universe goes on and on to, well, no one will ever know. The Ice Wall is just the start of the cold part. Kind of like a fresh water spring in Winter time. Have you not seen one while skying? I have. It is luke-warm and has green moss growing even in freezing temperatures, because the spring stays above the freeze level. And yet snow is all around it. The Earth is just a warm, naturally evolved, hot spring in an oasis of cold, darkness. Simple. No need for spooky myths and magical equations.
So, if you wish to have an actual discussion on this, and not simply do what the libtards do whenever one of us questions their tranny shite, then hit me up.
Rev. Lloyd, PM
Church of Ben Klassen
www.creativityreligion.com
I posted an article a few days ago asking why anyone who questions the system on EVERYTHING blindly accepts the globetard lie? When I first heard about Flat Earth Theory I thought it crazy. Plus I didn't want it to be true, as every physics paper I have authored would be made mute without the Globe Earth Model. But, being an inquisitive creature, I looked into this theory. And most of the evidence was correct. But that's not what surprised me.
No, what surprised me the most was the utter lack of any evidence to back up what I had been taught since I was five years old. I could find no proof that the Earth was a globe. And when I tried to disprove the Flat Earth Theory, as I always do with new theories, I could not prove it wrong. And when I looked to NASA for evidence, all I found were fake photos and cartoons.
So I threw out my belief in yet another jewish lie and began to believe in Flat Earth Theory. Which sucks, as ALL of my physics papers became unprovable under the new model. Oh, well. Truth is truth, even when it hurts. But then something else happened that just reinforced my acceptance of the new model. That was the way people slandered me and attacked me over this new belief.
Let me explain this. So, all the evidence proves the Earth exists on a flat plane. Naturally formed via basic laws of Nature and evolution. I ain't no spookist!! In fact, I am annoyed by the fact that 99% of those who believe in Flat Earth Theory are monotheist-insaners. Some christ-insaners, a few orthodox jews who reject the JEW WORLD ORDER's use of the globe lie, and every mudlim. Some Pagans and Odinists do, too. But those of us that are called atheist who believe in Flat Earth Theory are small. But that ain't the queerest thing. It's how I get attacked by the globetards that's crazy.
They bash me with emotion. As if I were attacking their religion. The logical part of their brain shuts off and the emotional side goes into overdrive. As if the globe myth was their christ-insanity. And in away belief in the globe Earth model and the Big Bang and Black Holes is more inline with spooky religious mythology than science. I mean, everything came together in a ball smaller than an atom, from nowhere aparently, and then exploded for no reason into the Universe. Which, depending on the 'scientist' you ask, is exspanding either via speeding up, slowing down, or at a stagnant pace... Huh??? How does that not sound like monotheist bible bullshit?
And Black Holes? Where the fuck does all that matter go? You claim that fancy Astro physics 'proves' that the matter shrinks to the size of an atom and doesn't explode like the Big Bang myth? Oh, it's also so strong it keeps matter in, except sometimes it spits stuff out. Depending on the 'scientist' you ask, of course.
But, really, the Big Bang, magical gravity, Black Holes, this all sounds like religion to me. Spooky religious nonsense. Even Light is lied about in the pseudoscience of Astro Physics. Light, we are told, is a constant. But that's not true. Some scientists measure the speed of light having a wide range. A very wide range, in fact. And one of my physics papers actually uses Black Holes to disprove the so-called 'constant speed' of light. I guess in either theory light just ain't what we are told it is.
I mean, what sounds more scientific to you :
The Universe came into being via some magical mumbo jumbo. And we live on a ball, that is one of eight different possible shapes, magically sticking to it while we croon around space at a million miles per hour. And even though we spin and travel and change our position in the Universe every hour, somehow the Constellations have maintained their current shape and area of the night sky for 50,000 years.
OR
The Universe evolved into a shaped dimension with layers, via natural evolution. That the Constellations have maintained their current shape and area in our sky for at least 42,000 years because the Earth does not rotate. And the Law of Density, not gravity, is why we stick to the Earth, and clouds rise above it. It's called Air-to-Ground ratio.
Which one of those sounds more like science to you? I'm going with the latter. You can keep your mythological MAGICAL globe fairy tale.
But I ask yet again, debate me with science and common sense, NOT simply throwing libtard slander at me because you get EMOTIONAL whenever someone points out the lie you were fed since childhood. I mean, you question the JFK assassination, the Moon 'landings', NASA's other bullshit, WW2, the holohoax, tranny craziness, the Mandela Effect, Waco, Ruby Ridge, the Trade Towers, Oklahoma City, etc..... But yet when it comes to Flat Earth you get as emotional as a jew whenever someone points out that the jewish population rose in the 1940's, NOT declined.
So, debate me. Sure. Just keep your emotions out of it. And stop sending me digital fake shots from NASA as so-called 'proof'. Some of that shite looks worse than a 10 year old's drawing!! Hey, if your myth is so right, you should be able to disprove mine, right?!
Here are some facts :
I have been on top of mountain peaks as high as 12,000 feet, up in a hot air balloon, and in aeroplanes at 35,000 feet, and yet have never seen a curve. Not to mention that you can use long-range cameras and binoculars to bring back into focus ships that supposedly 'dissopear downward over the horizon'. It's called the Law of Perspective. Thankfully modern technology proves the Horizon is NOT a curve.
The same system you are on this site/forum to question is the same system that has an agency who's job it is to promote disinformation on Flat Earth Theory. WHY??? If it's such a bullshit theory why spend tens of millions of dollars annually to discredit it with made-up crap?
NASA has not shown one piece of actual proof to back up it's CGI pictures of 'space'.
Why are satellites sent up attached to helium balloons? And how did they launch 100,000 satellites to begin with? There have only been a few thousand 'space' launches in history!?!
What did the SpaceX rocket hit and ricochet off of when it was launched? A Russian forcefield? Some magical wall? Maybe it was Allah? He don't want no rockets up in his home. Right? lol
Why wont they let anyone explore Antarctica? Even when you ask for a deep tour of the place they only send you to this one little area. Why can't you travel to the supposed centre? To the actual South Pole point?
The actual theory of the Flat Earth Model is that the Earth exists on a large plane. There are no edges, just as the Universe goes on and on to, well, no one will ever know. The Ice Wall is just the start of the cold part. Kind of like a fresh water spring in Winter time. Have you not seen one while skying? I have. It is luke-warm and has green moss growing even in freezing temperatures, because the spring stays above the freeze level. And yet snow is all around it. The Earth is just a warm, naturally evolved, hot spring in an oasis of cold, darkness. Simple. No need for spooky myths and magical equations.
So, if you wish to have an actual discussion on this, and not simply do what the libtards do whenever one of us questions their tranny shite, then hit me up.
Rev. Lloyd, PM
Church of Ben Klassen
www.creativityreligion.com