Jewish Psychopathy Called Yahweh: Irreconcilable Contradictions in the Four Gospels
Easter: The Big Event That Never Happened
By Ben Klassen
This includes the Crucifixion, the Resurrection, the Ascension, the Rapture and all the rest of that sorry claptrap.
For those interested, go to Charles Giuliani’s JewTube channel “Christendumb” (while it’s still there) for a thoroughly exhaustive analysis of this genocidal jewish mind virus called christianity.
For more than seventeen centuries Christian adherents, meaning mostly the White Race, have been so cowed and intimidated by the High Priesthood of Christianity that they hardly dared ask even the most obvious questions about “the faith” and some of those who did were tortured, hanged or burned at the stake. More recently, these unanswered questions are beginning to surface and press for answers. One of the most obvious questions is this: Are the “Sacred Scriptures” really founded on substantiated historical fact, or are they just lying to the bamboozled followers?
Since it is now that time of year again, let us take a long, objective look at the Easter story and see what the big ruckus is all about. Basically, the stories are told in the four Gospels; Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. They are all supposedly telling the “Gospel Truth,” and since all four Gospels describe the same set of events, they should coincide to the last detail.
Furthermore, since the Christian priesthood claims that all the scriptures are holy, guided by the hand of the “Holy Spirit,” Yahweh the Super Spook who knows all, sees all, is super smart and never makes a mistake. But how does it happen that there are so many discrepancies, variations and outright contradictions in the four versions as told by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John?
The basic story, as all the world knows, is about a central character named (Rabbi) Jesus Christ who supposedly was sent down to earth to save us poor deluded sinners from suffering the ultimate fate of being fried in hell forever and a day, a booby trap he and his father had themselves constructed, in order to save us all. It was ordained by his father that he be let loose on earth to preach a new line (from the Old Testament) for three short years and set us all straight.
Then the script calls for him being nailed to the cross, stabbed in the side by a spear, and left to die. This is supposed to bring us “salvation” and save us all from the grisly fate of being forever barbecued in hell. A weird story? Yes, indeed, and it would be considered a bizarre episode even in such TV fantasies as THE TWILIGHT ZONE series.
Now you would think that with such an important script, being guided by the hand of Yahweh the Super Spook himself, these fellows, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John would get their act together and be able to tell a straight story that would stand up in court, but they do not. Their four different versions are full of holes, discrepancies and contradictions. Having just read all four versions, here are some (not all) of the discrepancies I find in just a cursory examination.
The ‘Betrayal”
In Matthew, Jesus is betrayed by Judas and supposedly identified by kissing him. One of Jesus’ disciples drew a sword to defend him and struck a servant of the high priest. Jesus tells him to put away his sword and says “Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father and he shall give me twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled that thus it must be?”
Evidently the script had been scripted in advance by him and his father and they were bound to play it as planned. It would therefore seem that those nasties who crucified him were only carrying out a pre-written drama as scripted by Father and Son, who were really one, if you get the drift. Therefore poor Judas was only carrying out his predestined role in a drama over which he had no control (All loving God Yahweh knows all, sees all, not a hair falls from your head or a sparrow from the roof but HE wills it. Remember?).
To Judas credit, since he was picked to play the heavy, it says in Chapter 27 of Matthew that he repented the role he played, returned the thirty pieces of silver and hanged himself. Such a deal! Poor Judas! If only the thousands of White race-traitors in “our” U.S. government (JOG) who are betraying the White Race today would have as much integrity as did poor Judas and do likewise!
In Mark the same episode is described differently, and Jesus does not make the same speech about being able to call up twelve legions of angels at will, but instead says in effect: Hey, I was in the temple any number of times. Why didn’t you take me then? In Luke the story is similar but the dialogue is altogether different. In neither Mark nor Luke does it say anything about Judas repenting or hanging himself. In John’s version it says nothing about the Judas kiss, but instead as Judas and the multitude come to “arraign” him Jesus Just says. Whom seek ye? and when the crowd says Jesus of Nazareth, he answers, I am he. Simple as that. Nothing about Judas kissing or hanging.
Lugging the Cross
There are similar contradictions about Jesus lugging that cross up the hill. In the first three versions a fellow by the name of Simon, the Cyrenlan, carries the cross, with Jesus walking ahead of him. In John’s version Jesus drags it up the hill himself with his head encrusted by a crown of thorns. Whom can you believe?
The Crucifixion
In Matthew and in Mark, Jesus was crucified in a place called Golgotha. In Luke he was crucified on a hill called Calvary. In John, he again returned to a place called Golgotha where he was crucified. Come on, fellows. If you must lie, at least get your story straight
King of the Jews
One thing all four “Gospels” agree on is that a sign was nailed at the top of the cross proclaiming that Christ was The King of the Jews, although they all differed somewhat in the exact wording. Matthew: This is Jesus the King of the Jews. Mark: The King of the Jews. Luke: This is the King of the Jews. John: Jesus of Nazareth the King of the Jews. Question: Why should the Gentiles be so hopped up about some mythical king of jews?
Last Words
There is a drastic discrepancy as to what Christ’s last words were before he gave up the ghost. According to Matthew, as the moment of truth arrived, Jesus became desperate and cried out in a loud voice (in jewish yet) My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? A damn good question. Where was the All Loving Yahweh Super Spook while all this was going on? In Mark’s version he says the same thing in jewish Eloi, Eioi lama sabachthani? Except in Matthew “Eloi” is spelled “Eli.”
In Luke his last words were altogether different and Jesus is quoted as saying: Father forgive them for they know not what they do. He then gave up the ghost. In the John version we have another set of dialogue. As Jesus was hanging on the cross he saw his mother below and said to her, woman, behold thy son! Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! Next he is quoted as saying I thirst. Someone thrust up a sponge filled with vinegar and put it to his mouth. Then in John 19:30 it says: When Jesus had received the vinegar, he said, it is finished; and he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.
The Resurrection
We now come to the so-called resurrection about which there is much hocus-pocus and there are a variety of versions. In fact, too many to recapitulate in much detail here. According to Matthew, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the sepulchre. And behold there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven and rolled back the stone from the door and sat upon it.
Mark tells it differently. Mary M. and Mary, the mother of James, and a third woman by the name of Salome went to the sepulchre to bring sweet spices and anoint Jesus. When they got there the stone had already been rolled away, and when they entered the tomb they found a young man sitting on the right side, supposedly an angel who told them Jesus had left. It says nothing about an earthquake. In Luke it tells a similar story, except it says the women entered into the tomb, found no body, but there were two angels in shining garments. In John’s version Mary Magdalene runs into the sepulchre by herself while it was still dark and finds the stone rolled away (nothing about angels). She then runs back to tell Simon Peter and the other disciple that Christ is missing. Then all three of them run back to the tomb. Still no angels, but what a story.
The Ascension
There are a number of severely conflicting versions about the Ascension. Matthew says absolutely nothing about such nonsense. According to Mark, Jesus delivered a short peroration to his eleven, and after he had spoken, he was received up into heaven and sat on the right hand of God. In the Luke version Jesus is engaged in a number of strange incidents, has a number of conversations and then at Bethany, as he was blessing a number of people, he lifted up his hands, parted from them and was carried up into heaven. In the last Chapter of John the story is altogether different again, and much garbled. Evidently after the resurrection, Jesus appears to many people, wanders much, preaches much, and in the end sort of fades into the sunset. But it says nothing about an ascension.
The Rapture
The ascension seems like such a jolly good experience that a number of Christian fanatics are convinced that they too can and will at the end of time experience what is called The Rapture. I have seen bumper stickers on cars which say, “In case of The Rapture this vehicle will be unmanned.” Evidently they believe that they (being, oh so righteous!) will be sucked up as in a huge vacuum cleaner and zoomed up into heaven.
So much for all the hocus-pocus about the crucifixion, the resurrection, the ascension and the rapture. There is not one shred of historical evidence that any of this nonsense has ever happened. It is all based on stories supposedly told by the four “Gospels,” Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. But we know nothing about them either anymore than we know about Mother Goose, the cat and the fiddle and the cow that supposedly jumped over the moon.
All we have is literature of unknown origins, concocted and revamped by anonymous people, now long dead and unknown. Is there any reason to believe them? I think not. Not only are these stories bizarre beyond belief, but as we have just witnessed, the different versions of the key events don’t mesh. All I can say about whoever the people were who put these stories together is that the least they could do if they are going to lie to us, is to keep their stories consistent.
Actually Easter is an outgrowth of a combination of Pagan festivals celebrating Spring and/or the Vernal Equinox. Such festivals were well established, and one of them was in honor of Eastre, Eostre or Ostara, the pagan Anglo-Saxon goddess of spring or dawn, akin to Easter. It also surfaced in ancient Teutonic mythology. When Christianity became more powerful and pervasive, they usurped this pagan holiday and converted it into a Christian festival with their own concocted mythology as we have explored in the previous passages. Of course now we also have the Easter Bunny, its eggs (which any good Christian can tell you is symbolic of Jesus’ “rebirth”), and all the other crass commercial trappings, not unlike Christmas, to which the jew looks forward so eagerly ($$$) each year.
We Creators have seen through this whole jewish mess and have thrown it overboard for the garbage it is. We find the whole mess repugnant to our natural instincts as we do the Christian symbol of a dead jew being nailed to a cross. How ghoulish! If we were to use a parallel symbol of, say, a dead horse thief hanging by the neck from a rope as our logo for Creativity, people would think we had gone bonkers but it would be no more outrageous and repugnant than is the symbol of the cross.
The whole Christian thing is a jewish swindle from beginning to end, one that has needlessly laid a heavy guilt complex on the White Race for many centuries.
It is my prediction that until we replace jewish christianity with a healthy racial religion of our own we will never escape from the clutches of the jewish vampire.
As we expand our own White Man’s religion, based on the Eternal Laws of Nature, the Lessons of History and on Logic and Common Sense, we will again celebrate Easter as once did our pagan ancestors, as a happy and natural festival of Spring and the Vernal Equinox.
Never trust a Christian. Anyone who will lie to himself will lie to others.
Easter: The Big Event That Never Happened
By Ben Klassen
This includes the Crucifixion, the Resurrection, the Ascension, the Rapture and all the rest of that sorry claptrap.
For those interested, go to Charles Giuliani’s JewTube channel “Christendumb” (while it’s still there) for a thoroughly exhaustive analysis of this genocidal jewish mind virus called christianity.
For more than seventeen centuries Christian adherents, meaning mostly the White Race, have been so cowed and intimidated by the High Priesthood of Christianity that they hardly dared ask even the most obvious questions about “the faith” and some of those who did were tortured, hanged or burned at the stake. More recently, these unanswered questions are beginning to surface and press for answers. One of the most obvious questions is this: Are the “Sacred Scriptures” really founded on substantiated historical fact, or are they just lying to the bamboozled followers?
Since it is now that time of year again, let us take a long, objective look at the Easter story and see what the big ruckus is all about. Basically, the stories are told in the four Gospels; Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. They are all supposedly telling the “Gospel Truth,” and since all four Gospels describe the same set of events, they should coincide to the last detail.
Furthermore, since the Christian priesthood claims that all the scriptures are holy, guided by the hand of the “Holy Spirit,” Yahweh the Super Spook who knows all, sees all, is super smart and never makes a mistake. But how does it happen that there are so many discrepancies, variations and outright contradictions in the four versions as told by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John?
The basic story, as all the world knows, is about a central character named (Rabbi) Jesus Christ who supposedly was sent down to earth to save us poor deluded sinners from suffering the ultimate fate of being fried in hell forever and a day, a booby trap he and his father had themselves constructed, in order to save us all. It was ordained by his father that he be let loose on earth to preach a new line (from the Old Testament) for three short years and set us all straight.
Then the script calls for him being nailed to the cross, stabbed in the side by a spear, and left to die. This is supposed to bring us “salvation” and save us all from the grisly fate of being forever barbecued in hell. A weird story? Yes, indeed, and it would be considered a bizarre episode even in such TV fantasies as THE TWILIGHT ZONE series.
Now you would think that with such an important script, being guided by the hand of Yahweh the Super Spook himself, these fellows, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John would get their act together and be able to tell a straight story that would stand up in court, but they do not. Their four different versions are full of holes, discrepancies and contradictions. Having just read all four versions, here are some (not all) of the discrepancies I find in just a cursory examination.
The ‘Betrayal”
In Matthew, Jesus is betrayed by Judas and supposedly identified by kissing him. One of Jesus’ disciples drew a sword to defend him and struck a servant of the high priest. Jesus tells him to put away his sword and says “Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father and he shall give me twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled that thus it must be?”
Evidently the script had been scripted in advance by him and his father and they were bound to play it as planned. It would therefore seem that those nasties who crucified him were only carrying out a pre-written drama as scripted by Father and Son, who were really one, if you get the drift. Therefore poor Judas was only carrying out his predestined role in a drama over which he had no control (All loving God Yahweh knows all, sees all, not a hair falls from your head or a sparrow from the roof but HE wills it. Remember?).
To Judas credit, since he was picked to play the heavy, it says in Chapter 27 of Matthew that he repented the role he played, returned the thirty pieces of silver and hanged himself. Such a deal! Poor Judas! If only the thousands of White race-traitors in “our” U.S. government (JOG) who are betraying the White Race today would have as much integrity as did poor Judas and do likewise!
In Mark the same episode is described differently, and Jesus does not make the same speech about being able to call up twelve legions of angels at will, but instead says in effect: Hey, I was in the temple any number of times. Why didn’t you take me then? In Luke the story is similar but the dialogue is altogether different. In neither Mark nor Luke does it say anything about Judas repenting or hanging himself. In John’s version it says nothing about the Judas kiss, but instead as Judas and the multitude come to “arraign” him Jesus Just says. Whom seek ye? and when the crowd says Jesus of Nazareth, he answers, I am he. Simple as that. Nothing about Judas kissing or hanging.
Lugging the Cross
There are similar contradictions about Jesus lugging that cross up the hill. In the first three versions a fellow by the name of Simon, the Cyrenlan, carries the cross, with Jesus walking ahead of him. In John’s version Jesus drags it up the hill himself with his head encrusted by a crown of thorns. Whom can you believe?
The Crucifixion
In Matthew and in Mark, Jesus was crucified in a place called Golgotha. In Luke he was crucified on a hill called Calvary. In John, he again returned to a place called Golgotha where he was crucified. Come on, fellows. If you must lie, at least get your story straight
King of the Jews
One thing all four “Gospels” agree on is that a sign was nailed at the top of the cross proclaiming that Christ was The King of the Jews, although they all differed somewhat in the exact wording. Matthew: This is Jesus the King of the Jews. Mark: The King of the Jews. Luke: This is the King of the Jews. John: Jesus of Nazareth the King of the Jews. Question: Why should the Gentiles be so hopped up about some mythical king of jews?
Last Words
There is a drastic discrepancy as to what Christ’s last words were before he gave up the ghost. According to Matthew, as the moment of truth arrived, Jesus became desperate and cried out in a loud voice (in jewish yet) My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? A damn good question. Where was the All Loving Yahweh Super Spook while all this was going on? In Mark’s version he says the same thing in jewish Eloi, Eioi lama sabachthani? Except in Matthew “Eloi” is spelled “Eli.”
In Luke his last words were altogether different and Jesus is quoted as saying: Father forgive them for they know not what they do. He then gave up the ghost. In the John version we have another set of dialogue. As Jesus was hanging on the cross he saw his mother below and said to her, woman, behold thy son! Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! Next he is quoted as saying I thirst. Someone thrust up a sponge filled with vinegar and put it to his mouth. Then in John 19:30 it says: When Jesus had received the vinegar, he said, it is finished; and he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.
The Resurrection
We now come to the so-called resurrection about which there is much hocus-pocus and there are a variety of versions. In fact, too many to recapitulate in much detail here. According to Matthew, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the sepulchre. And behold there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven and rolled back the stone from the door and sat upon it.
Mark tells it differently. Mary M. and Mary, the mother of James, and a third woman by the name of Salome went to the sepulchre to bring sweet spices and anoint Jesus. When they got there the stone had already been rolled away, and when they entered the tomb they found a young man sitting on the right side, supposedly an angel who told them Jesus had left. It says nothing about an earthquake. In Luke it tells a similar story, except it says the women entered into the tomb, found no body, but there were two angels in shining garments. In John’s version Mary Magdalene runs into the sepulchre by herself while it was still dark and finds the stone rolled away (nothing about angels). She then runs back to tell Simon Peter and the other disciple that Christ is missing. Then all three of them run back to the tomb. Still no angels, but what a story.
The Ascension
There are a number of severely conflicting versions about the Ascension. Matthew says absolutely nothing about such nonsense. According to Mark, Jesus delivered a short peroration to his eleven, and after he had spoken, he was received up into heaven and sat on the right hand of God. In the Luke version Jesus is engaged in a number of strange incidents, has a number of conversations and then at Bethany, as he was blessing a number of people, he lifted up his hands, parted from them and was carried up into heaven. In the last Chapter of John the story is altogether different again, and much garbled. Evidently after the resurrection, Jesus appears to many people, wanders much, preaches much, and in the end sort of fades into the sunset. But it says nothing about an ascension.
The Rapture
The ascension seems like such a jolly good experience that a number of Christian fanatics are convinced that they too can and will at the end of time experience what is called The Rapture. I have seen bumper stickers on cars which say, “In case of The Rapture this vehicle will be unmanned.” Evidently they believe that they (being, oh so righteous!) will be sucked up as in a huge vacuum cleaner and zoomed up into heaven.
So much for all the hocus-pocus about the crucifixion, the resurrection, the ascension and the rapture. There is not one shred of historical evidence that any of this nonsense has ever happened. It is all based on stories supposedly told by the four “Gospels,” Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. But we know nothing about them either anymore than we know about Mother Goose, the cat and the fiddle and the cow that supposedly jumped over the moon.
All we have is literature of unknown origins, concocted and revamped by anonymous people, now long dead and unknown. Is there any reason to believe them? I think not. Not only are these stories bizarre beyond belief, but as we have just witnessed, the different versions of the key events don’t mesh. All I can say about whoever the people were who put these stories together is that the least they could do if they are going to lie to us, is to keep their stories consistent.
Actually Easter is an outgrowth of a combination of Pagan festivals celebrating Spring and/or the Vernal Equinox. Such festivals were well established, and one of them was in honor of Eastre, Eostre or Ostara, the pagan Anglo-Saxon goddess of spring or dawn, akin to Easter. It also surfaced in ancient Teutonic mythology. When Christianity became more powerful and pervasive, they usurped this pagan holiday and converted it into a Christian festival with their own concocted mythology as we have explored in the previous passages. Of course now we also have the Easter Bunny, its eggs (which any good Christian can tell you is symbolic of Jesus’ “rebirth”), and all the other crass commercial trappings, not unlike Christmas, to which the jew looks forward so eagerly ($$$) each year.
We Creators have seen through this whole jewish mess and have thrown it overboard for the garbage it is. We find the whole mess repugnant to our natural instincts as we do the Christian symbol of a dead jew being nailed to a cross. How ghoulish! If we were to use a parallel symbol of, say, a dead horse thief hanging by the neck from a rope as our logo for Creativity, people would think we had gone bonkers but it would be no more outrageous and repugnant than is the symbol of the cross.
The whole Christian thing is a jewish swindle from beginning to end, one that has needlessly laid a heavy guilt complex on the White Race for many centuries.
It is my prediction that until we replace jewish christianity with a healthy racial religion of our own we will never escape from the clutches of the jewish vampire.
As we expand our own White Man’s religion, based on the Eternal Laws of Nature, the Lessons of History and on Logic and Common Sense, we will again celebrate Easter as once did our pagan ancestors, as a happy and natural festival of Spring and the Vernal Equinox.
Never trust a Christian. Anyone who will lie to himself will lie to others.